indem er ihren Besitz von Kernwaffe

indem er ihren Besitz von Kernwaffen legitimierte und somit deren wirtschaftliches und militärisches Gewicht stärkte
109 und Verbot gleichzeitig den Nichtkernwaffenstaaten Kernwaffen(programme) zu entwickeln110. Aufgrund dieser Ungleichbehandlung gerät die unbegrenzte Verlängerung von 1995 heute noch immer wieder in der Kritik. Eine Position war der Auffassung, dass die Befristung eine Möglichkeit war um effektiv Druck auf die Atommächte auszuüben, was jedoch aufgrund der zeitlich ungebundenen Legalisierung der Atommächte nicht mehr möglich sei111. Andere sahen in der unbegrenzten Verlängerung den Anbruch einer neuen Ära in der nuklearen Abrüstung. Australien stellte klar, dass nur die vollständige Abrüstung zur Vertragserfüllung führe und die Abrüstungsverpflichtung nur im NVV schriftlich festgehalten sei112.

결과 (영어) 1:

by legitimizing their possession of nuclear weapons and thus strengthened its economic and military weight109 and ban at the same time the non-nuclear States Kernwaffen(programme) to entwickeln110. Due to this difference in treatment device the unlimited extension of 1995 today yet again in the criticism. A position was of the opinion that the time limit was a way to effectively exert pressure on the nuclear powers, which due to the time unbound legalization of the nuclear-weapon States cannot be sei111. Others saw the dawning of a new era in nuclear disarmament in the unlimited extension. Australia has made it clear that only full disarmament would lead to the fulfilment of the contract and the disarmament obligation only in the NPT sei112 recorded in writing.

결과 (영어) 2:

by legitimizing their possession of nuclear weapons and thus their economic and military weight strengthened
109 and prohibition simultaneously the non-nuclear states nuclear weapons (programs) to entwickeln110. Because of this difference in treatment, the indefinite extension of the 1995 unit still repeatedly criticized. A position was of the opinion that the time limit was a way to effectively put pressure on the nuclear powers, which, however, due to the time-unbound legalizing nuclear powers no longer possible sei111. Others saw in the indefinite extension of the dawn of a new era in nuclear disarmament. Australia clarified that only the complete disarmament of fulfilling the contract and lead the disarmament obligation sei112 written down only in the NPT.

결과 (영어) 3:

by their possession of nuclear weapons, legitimate and thus whose economic and military weight.at the same time, the nuclear weapon states of nuclear weapons and banning 109 (programs) to entwickeln110. because of this unequal treatment device the indefinite extension in 1995 still back in the criticism. a position was of the view that the limitation of one option was to put pressure on the nuclear powers to exercise effectively, but due to the time by means of legalization of the nuclear powers will no longer be possible sei111. others saw in the unlimited extension of the dawn of a new era in nuclear disarmament. australia made it clear that only the complete disarmament and the commitment to disarm the contract will only sei112 npt states in writing.