2002 wurden von einer iranischen Op

2002 wurden von einer iranischen Oppositionsgruppe Informationen über die inländischen Nuklearaktivitäten an die USA weiter gegeben124, wodurch bekannt wurde, dass der Iran bei Natanz meldepflichtige Anlagen zu Uran-Hochanreicherung und in Arak einen Schwerwasserreaktor verheimlicht hatte. Nach Übermittlung der Informationen an die IAEO verlangte diese vollständige Auskunft über die Aktivitäten, woraufhin der Iran sich zur Errichtung der Anlagen bekannte, jedoch auf die zivile Nutzung verwies und argumentierte, dass eine Meldung bis zu diesem Zeitpunkt nicht verpflichtend gewesen wäre125. Die IAEO empfand die Informationen als unzureichend und verlangte Zutritt, welcher, infolge der Unterzeichnung des Zusatzprotokolls, 2003 gewährt wurde. Die Untersuchungen ergaben, dass sich in den Anlagen Spuren von hochangereichertem Uran befanden, welches für waffenzwecke nutzbar wäre126. Der Iran verstrickte sich daraufhin in Widersprüche. 2004 stimmte er infolge der "Pariser Vereinbarung" zu, die Anreicherung bis auf weiteres zu unterlassen127, was jedoch 2006 der neue iranische Präsident Mahmud Ahmadinedschad wieder rückgängig machte128. Der Aufsichtsrat der IAEO delegierte den Fall 2006 an den UN-Sicherheitsrat, da Vermittlungsversuche keine Einigung erbrachten129.

결과 (영어) 1:

2002, details the domestic nuclear activities to the United States of next gegeben124, which became known that the Iran at Natanz had hidden a heavy water reactor reporting systems to high enrichment of uranium, and in Arak have been from an Iranian opposition group. After transmission of the information to the IAEA demanded and the Iran pled this full information about the activities, to the construction of the facilities, however referred to civilian use, arguing that a message not compulsory up to that point been wäre125. The IAEA felt the information as inadequate and demanded entry, which was granted as a result of the signing of the additional protocol in 2003. The investigations showed that traces of highly-enriched uranium were in the facilities for weapon purposes can be used wäre126. The Iran then became embroiled in contradictions. 2004 he agreed to as a result of the "MOU", the enrichment until further notice to unterlassen127, but in 2006 the new Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinedschad reverse machte128. The Supervisory Board of the IAEA delegates 2006 case to the UN Security Council, as mediation efforts no agreement erbrachten129.

결과 (영어) 2:

2002 Information on national nuclear activities to the United States continue gegeben124, which became known that Iran at Natanz notifiable plants to uranium from an Iranian opposition group - had concealed high enrichment and Arak a heavy water reactor. After forwarding the information to the IAEA demanded this full information about the activities, whereupon Iran pleaded for construction of the plants, however, referred to the civilian use and argued that a message up to this point not been mandatory wäre125. The IAEA found the information to be insufficient and demanded entry, which was granted as a result of signing the Additional Protocol of 2003. The investigation revealed that in the plants traces of highly enriched uranium were that wäre126 usable for weapons purposes. Iran then became embroiled in contradictions. In 2004 he agreed as a result of the "MOU" to the accumulation until further unterlassen127, but this 2006, the new Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to reverse machte128. The supervisory board of the IAEA delegated the case in 2006 at the UN - Security Council since mediation erbrachten129 no agreement.

결과 (영어) 3:

in 2002, an iranian opposition group information on the domestic developing in the usa continues to gegeben124, which it was known that iran in natanz uranium hochanreicherung reportable equipment and in a heavy water reactor is arak. after transmission of information to the iaea demanded the complete information on the activities, and the iran to build the plants known, but on the civilian use of pointed and argued that a message up to this time had been mandatory wäre125. the iaea said information as inadequate and demanded admittance, which, as a result of the signing of the additional protocol, 2003 was granted. the investigations showed that the plants were traces of highly enriched uranium, which is available for wäre126 cut-off. iran then mired in contradictions. in 2004 he agreed as a result of the paris agreement, the enrichment to unterlassen127 until further notice, but in 2006 the new iranian president mahmoud ahmadinejad to reverse machte128. the board of the iaea delegates the event in 2006, the un security council, there is no agreement erbrachten129 mediate.