Probleme ergaben sich insbesondere

Probleme ergaben sich insbesondere bei der Frage nach der Errichtung einer massenvernichtungswaffenfreien Zone im Nahen und Mittleren Osten, deren Umsetzung Teil der Verlängerungsvereinbarungen von 1995 waren88. Großbritannien, die USA und Kanada verweigerten gänzlich ihre Zustimmung, mehrere arabische Staaten und Ägypten forderten eine Konferenz um weiter darüber zu debattieren89. Weitere Probleme ergaben sich aufgrund von generellen Meinungsverschiedenheiten bezüglich der Zukunft von nuklearer Abrüstung90. Es wurde deutlich, dass die Kluft zwischen den Staaten immer unüberwindbarer wird. Die Kernwaffenstaaten planen ihre Arsenale zu modernisieren, wohingegen die Nichtkernwaffenstaaten beklagen, dass seit der Überprüfungskonferenz 2010 keine konkreten Abrüstungsschritte unternommen worden wären91. Im Zuge dessen hat sich die Humanitäre Initiative formiert, der sich seit 2012 159 Staaten angeschlossen haben (Stand April 15! Aktuell?)92. Diese konzentriert sich auf die katastrophalen humanitären Auswirkungen im Falle von Nuklearwaffeneinsätzen und fordert ein Verbot von Atomwaffen93. Die Einigung auf ein Abschlussdokument war folglich trotz intensiver Verhandlungen aufgrund von zu unterschiedlichen Vorstellungen nicht möglich94.

결과 (영어) 1:

Problems occurred particularly in the question after the establishment of mass-destruction-free zone in the middle and Middle East, the implementation part of the extension agreements from 1995 waren88. United Kingdom, the United States and Canada refused completely, several Arab States and Egypt called for a Conference to continue about it to debattieren89. More problems arose due to General disagreements about the future of nuclear Abrüstung90. It became clear that the gap between the States is always insurmountable. The nuclear-weapon States are planning to modernize their arsenals, while the non-nuclear-weapon States complain that the Review Conference 2010 no concrete disarmament steps taken since have been wären91. In the course of which the humanitarian initiative has formed, the 2012 159 States have joined (as of April 15! Up-to-date?) 92. This concentrates on the disastrous humanitarian consequences in the case of nuclear weapons deployments and calls for a ban on Atomwaffen93. Consequently, the agreement on a final document was not möglich94 despite intensive negotiations because of different concepts.

결과 (영어) 2:

Problems arose in particular with the question of the establishment of a WMD-free zone in the Middle East, the implementation of the renewal agreements 1995 waren88. Britain, the United States and Canada refused entirely their agreement, several Arab states and Egypt called for a conference to further debattieren89 about. Further problems were due to general dispute over the future of nuclear Abrüstung90. It became clear that the gap between the States is always insurmountable. The nuclear-weapon States to plan their arsenals to modernize, whereas the non-nuclear weapon states complain been that no concrete steps towards disarmament since the 2010 Review Conference wären91. In the course of the Humanitarian Initiative has formed, which have joined since 2012 159 countries (as of April 15! News?) 92nd This focuses on the catastrophic humanitarian consequences in the case of nuclear weapons deployments and calls for a ban of Atomwaffen93. The agreement on a final document was consequently despite intensive negotiations due to different ideas not möglich94.

결과 (영어) 3:

problems have emerged, especially in the question of the establishment of a massenvernichtungswaffenfreien zone in the middle east, the implementation of the verlängerungsvereinbarungen from 1995 waren88. britain, the united states and canada refused to fully support, several arab states and egypt called for a conference to continue to debattieren89. further problems arose due to differences of opinion regarding the future of general nuclear abrüstung90. it was clear that the gap between the states always insurmountable. the nuclear weapon states plan to modernise their arsenals, while the nuclear weapon states complain that since the review conference in 2010, no concrete steps have been taken wären91 arms. as a result, the humanitarian initiative. however, since 2012, 159 countries have joined (as of april 15. current?) 92. this is focused on the disastrous humanitarian consequences in the case of nuklearwaffeneinsätzen and calls for a ban on atomwaffen93. agreement on a final document was thus despite intensive negotiations, due to different ideas, not möglich94.